- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Jyoti Singh
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 15517/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Jyoti Singh
Judgment
O R D E R %
04.03.2025 CM APPL. 11708/2025
¶1This application is preferred on behalf of the original Petitioner for a direction to Special Task Force ('STF') to decide the pending representation of the Petitioner in a time bound manner in terms of directions passed by this Court on 07.11.2024 while disposing of the writ petition.
¶2It is clear from reading of order dated 07.11.2024 that writ petition seeking action in respect of unauthorized construction by Respondents No.8 to 34 in subject property, was disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach the STF with a direction to STF to act upon Petitioner's complaint expeditiously. From the application, it appears that STF has so far not taken any action on Petitioner's complaint.
¶3Accordingly, without looking into maintainability of this application, This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 15517/2024
the same is disposed of with a direction to STF to consider the complaint of the Petitioner, if not already considered, in a time bound manner in its next meeting and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 4, 2025 S.Sharma This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P.(C) 15517/2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15517/2024 SHUBH RACHNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan and Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS ....Respondents Through: Ms. Neeru Vaid, Standing Counsel, for R-1/MCD. Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, SC with Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate for BSES RPL. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.