VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Mubashshira v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
8 November 2024
Bench
Manoj Kumar Ohriauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 8744/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manoj Kumar Ohri

Judgment

O R D E R %

08.11.2024

¶1The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.106/2016 registered under Sections 389/452/323/506 IPC at P.S. Chandni Mahal, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶2As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner engaged in a quarrel and gave beatings to the complainant.

¶3Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioner is the accused and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that the chargesheet in the present case has been filed.

¶4Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Settlement and Compromise Deed dated 07.10.2024 This is a digitally signed order. and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue any legal action against the present petitioner herein and is now left with no claims or grievances whatsoever against the present petitioner.

¶5The petitioner and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer.

¶6The petitioner has shown remorse for her conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Settlement and Compromise Deed with the present petitioner out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed against the present petitioner.

¶7Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶8The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

¶9In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed against the present petitioner.

¶10With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 8, 2024 na This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8744/2024 and CRL.M.A. 33462/2024 MUBASHSHIRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vipin Rana, Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Harish Kumar Ms.Ritu and Mr.Vinay Panwar, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.