VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited v. Sunil Kumar Garga

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
3 November 2011
Bench
G.S.Sistaniauthor
Case no.
ARB.P. 162/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow G.S.Sistani

Judgment

ORDER "/" O3.1,L.2OI-1-petitioner has filed present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an independent arbitrator. lt is submitted that before filing the present petition respondent had already appointed Justice J.D. Kapoor, formerJudge of this Court, as an independent arbitrator. Counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the appointment of Justice J.D. Kapoor, as the sole arbitrator. Let the learned arbitrator decide the claims and counter claims ,tf-) '' between the Parties. In view of the stand taken by counsel for the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the petition and the same is accordingly, disPosed of. lA. No.8498/2O1"1 In view of order passed in the main petition (ARB.P. I62l2OlL), application stands disPosed of. NOVEMBER 03, 2OT"1 SSN Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Case details

Parties and counsel

L $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 162120TI ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ..... PCtitiONET Through: Mr.B.B. Gupta, Mr.Harsh Hari Haran and Mr.R. Gautam, Advocates VCTSUS SUNIL KUMAR GARGA ""' Respondent Through: Mr.ManishVashisht,Advocate CORAM: ,r HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.