Bhabatosh Dey v. NCT of Delhi & Ors

O R D E R %

02.11.2016 Respondent no.3 is wife of respondent no.2. Petitioner is father of respondent no.2. Respondent no.3 for herself and on behalf of her husband, that is, respondent no.2, submits that they do not have the original sale deed of Calcutta property or any other documents including cheque books and share certificates of petitioner. In view of this statement, present petition has not been pressed and the same is disposed of as not pressed, at this stage. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 02, 2016/dk

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 873/2016 & Crl.M.A.7605/2016 BHABATOSH DEY ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Shashank Deo Sudhi and Mr. D. K. Chaubey, Advs. versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC and Mr. Ananya Mohan, Adv. with SI Sanjeev Lohri PS Safdarjung Enclave. Respondent no.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK