Anjul Oberoi v. Smt Sujata Chaturvedi and Ors

O R D E R %

12.11.2024

¶1Petitioner had earlier field a writ petition i.e. W.P. (C) 16646/2023 which was disposed of by learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated

22.12.2023. Such order reads as under: - "1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that, at this juncture, he would be satisfied if a direction may be given to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider the representation given by the Petitioner in the month of November, 2023.

¶2The Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation given by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

¶3The writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application (s), if any."

¶2When asked, it was informed that respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2 in the aforesaid Writ Petition were Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Youth & Sports and Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of This is a digitally signed order. CONT.CAS(C) 1784/2024 2

Home Affairs respectively.

¶3Basketball Federation of India and Uttar Pradesh Basketball Association were also respondents in the aforesaid Writ Petition, as respondent no. 4 and respondent no. 5 respectively.

¶4The grievance raised in the present Contempt Petition is that despite there being specific direction, respondent nos. 1 & 2 have not considered the representation.

¶5According to learned counsel for petitioner, there were certain internal communications between the Centre and the State Body but their representation is yet not decided.

¶6Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2 has stated that the position of Union of India is little difficult in the present scenario as the aspect related to "Sports" is a State subject which falls under Schedule-II of the Constitution of India. He, however, states that since the requisite reply has already been received from the State Body, they would, within the permissible scope and ambit, send requisite communication to the petitioner informing him about the outcome of his representation. It is undertaken that aforesaid communication shall be sent within ten days from today.

¶7Such statement is taken on record.

¶8In view of the above, learned counsel for petitioner, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

¶9Present petition stands disposed of as not pressed.

MANOJ JAIN, J NOVEMBER 12, 2024/dr This is a digitally signed order.

CONT.CAS(C) 1784/2024 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1784/2024 ANJUL OBEROI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Joshi and Mr. Ajayh Kanojiya, Advocates versus SMT SUJATA CHATURVEDI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni (CGSC) with Mr. Devvrat Yadav (G.P), Ms. Sanchari Banerjee and Ms. Ishika Soni, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Mahendharan T., Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B. and Ms. Pariksha, Advocates for R-3 & R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN