Rajiv Jain v. The State NCT of Delhi

O R D E R %

19.11.2025

¶1The learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the present bail application stating that the medical opinion which has been received after filing of the present bail application, exonerates the applicant of the alleged offences.

¶2He submits that the medical opinion clearly indicates that the injury caused by the applicant was not sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. This is a digitally signed order. 3. He submits that since the matter is now listed before the learned Trial Court for arguments on charge, he will take all arguments before the learned Trial Court and seeks liberty to file an application afresh after the learned Trial Court has heard the arguments on charge.

¶4In view of the above, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶5It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the learned Trial Court shall pass the order uninfluenced by any observation that may have been made by this Court in the orders passed earlier. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 "SS" This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3949/2025, CRL.M.A. 30814/2025 & CRL.M.A. 31252/2025 RAJIV JAIN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Kush Sharma, Ms. Asiya Khan, Mr. Nishchaya Nigam, Ms. Pousali, Ms. Anugya Gupta, Ms. Disha Sharma & Mr. Abdul Vahid, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Ms. Divya Yadav & Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advs. Inspector Robin Singh, PS- Gandhi Nagar Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Mr. R.K. Gupta & Ms. Anushka Gupta, Advs. for complainant with Complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN