VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Aditya Bansal & Ors v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
13 November 2024
Bench
Manoj Kumar Ohriauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 8862/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

13.11.2024

¶1The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.684/2022 registered under Sections 323/341 IPC at P.S. Jyoti Nagar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶2As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners gave beatings as a result of which the complainant suffered some injuries.

¶3Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioners are the accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that the chargesheet in the present case has been filed under Sections 323/325/341/506/509/308/34 IPC.

¶4Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Memorandum of Settlement/MOU dated 08.02.2024 This is a digitally signed order. and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue any legal action against the present petitioners herein and is now left with no claims or grievances whatsoever against the present petitioners.

¶5The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer.

¶6The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that he has entered into the aforesaid Memorandum of Settlement/MOU with the present petitioners out of his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed against the present petitioners.

¶7Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶8The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

¶9In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed against the present petitioners.

¶10With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024 na

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8862/2024 and CRL.M.A. 33903/2024 ADITYA BANSAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Jagdeep Sharma, Mr.Ankit Tyagi, Mr.Raj Kumar and Ms.Kanta Sharma, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Shoaib Haider, APP for State with SI Pankaj Kumar Mr.Mohd. Zahid and Mr.Brahm Kr. Pandey, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.