- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2024
- Bench
- Mini Pushkarna
- Case no.
- CS(COMM) 1003/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2024
¶1Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that certain amendments need to be carried out in the plaint and certain other documents need to be filed. Therefore, he submits that he may be granted liberty to file the plaint, afresh.
¶2He further requests that the Court Fees deposited in the present plaint may be allowed to be used in the fresh plaint on the same cause of action.
¶3Accordingly, it is directed that the Court Fee which has been locked for the present suit, shall be unlocked and shall be allowed to be used by the plaintiff in the fresh suit, to be filed on the same cause of action.
¶4In view of the aforesaid, the present suit along with the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the plaintiff to file a This is a digitally signed order. fresh plaint, on the same cause of action. MINI PUSHKARNA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024/kr This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1003/2024, I.A. 44814/2024, I.A. 44815/2024, I.A. 44816/2024 & I.A. 44817/2024 ELDER PRROJECT LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kaveesh Nail, Ms. Vidula Mehrotra, Mr. Utsav Saxena, Ms. Mahima Mukherjee and Ms. Rachael Tuli, Advs. versus ELDER DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Uttam Datt, Mr. Vikas Rohtagi, Mr. Neeraj Singh, Ms. Sonakshi Singh and Mr. Pankaj Pohilla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.