Pawam Ramawat & Ors v. Delhi Development Authority

ORDER 0/o

24.05.2013 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions by Shri Karan Singh. Such liberty has been sought considering that the petitioners are not party to the proceedings pending before the Deputy Commissioner. ,:· /= The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Dismissal of the writ petitions shall not come in the way of Shri Karan Singh to file writ petition( s) claiming the same reliefs as sought in these petitions MAY 24, 2013/rd --- -:·,

\ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P(C) NO. 3498/2013 & CM Nos. 6601/2013 & 6602/2013 PAW AN RAMA VAT ..... Petitioner DDA Through: Mr. Manohar Lal, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Mr. Devvrat Singh Raghav, Advs. for DDA + W.P(C) NO. 3512/2013 & CM Nos. 6619/2013 & 6620/2013 PAW AN RAMA VAT & Ors. . .... Petitioner DDA CORAM: Through: Mr. Manohar Lal, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Mr. Devvrat Singh Raghav, Advs. fot DDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN