- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 14 November 2024
- Bench
- Girish Kathpalia
- Case no.
- RFA 784/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
14.11.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 66471/2024 (exemption)
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 66472/2024 (for condonation of delay of 17 days in refiling)
¶2For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and delay in re-filing the appeal after removal of defects is condoned. RFA 784/2024 & CM APPL. 66470/2024 (stay)
¶3The appellant has assailed judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court under Order XII Rule 6 CPC directing restoration of possession of the subject premises to the respondent landlord. After addressing partly, learned counsel for appellant on instructions of his client present in court seeks permission to withdraw this appeal if her possession can be protected for a period of four months. Accordingly, the appeal as well as pending application are dismissed as withdrawn, directing that operation of the impugned judgment and decree shall remain stayed only for a period of four This is a digitally signed order. months and the appellant shall vacate the subject property on or before
14.03.2025, but in case she does not vacate the subject property by
14.03.2025, the impugned decree shall be executed in accordance with law.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024/ry
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 784/2024 SAROJ KUMARI .....Appellant Thro ugh: Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Advoate with petitioner in person. versus URMILA POPLI .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.