VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Smt Honey v. The State NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2024
Bench
Jasmeet Singhauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 4135/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2024 CRL.M.A. 34075/2024

¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 4135/2024

¶3This is a petition filed under section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 062/2024 under Sections 356/379/34 of IPC registered at Police Station - Kamla Market.

¶4As per the FIR, it is alleged that the husband of the petitioner alongwith co-accused snatched gold chain from the complainant and thereafter the petitioner, being the wife the accused namely Shivam, deposited the same (alongwith other gold chains melted to make one) with Mannapuram Gold Finance.

¶5The husband of the petitioner has already been granted regular bail The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. and during the entire investigation, the petitioner has not been arrested. The petitioner has joined investigation and further assures the Court that she will join the investigation.

¶6Issue notice.

¶7Ms Dalal, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State and states that the investigation is substantially done.

¶8Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond to the sum of Rs. 20,000/-with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer and also subject to the following further conditions:-

(i) At the time of furnishing bail bond, the petitioner shall provide the mobile number, which she undertakes to keep operational at all times during the pendency of the trial.

(ii) The petitioner shall inform the concerned Investigating Officer about her current residential address.

(iii) In case of change of residential addresses/contact details, the petitioner shall promptly inform the same to the concerned Investigating Officer/SHO.

(iv)The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when asked.

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly try to get in touch with the complainant or any other prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence.

(vi)The petitioner shall regularly appear before the trial Court.

¶9Needless to state that nothing observed hereinabove shall amount to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. an expression on the merits of the case and shall not have a bearing on the trial of the case as the same has been expressed only for the purpose of the disposal of the present petition. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024/sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 4135/2024 SMT HONEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr Sunil Tiwari, Adv. (through VC) Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms Priyanka Dalal, APP for State SI Virender, PS-Kamla Market CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.