Reena Mehta v. Upinder Maira & Ors

O R D E R

02.11.2011 Two pay orders drawn on the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking CorporationLimited,both dated 21.10.2011,in the sum of INR 22,600,000/- each have been handed over by the learned co-msel for the respondents No.1 and 2 to thepetitionerin Courttoday,whichhave been acceptedby the ^ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. petitioner. Likewise, two pay orders drawn on the same Banlc, also dated

21.10.2011 in the sum of INR 22,600,000/- each have been handed over by the learned counsel for the respondentsNo.l and 2 to the counsel for the respondentNo.3 today, which have been accepted by the counsel for the respondentNo.3. Yet another pay order drawn on the same Bank dated

21.10.2011 in the sum of INR 22,600,000/-ishanded over to the respondent No.4 - Ms. BandanaMaira,who ispresentin Courttoday and has acceptedthe same. The counsel for the parties are agreed that after payment of the aforesaidpay orders,a sum of^ 66,000/-each remainsdue and payableto the petitionerby the respondentsNo.l and 2, that is, in all ^ 1,32,000/-. It is also agreedthat likewiseasum of^ 66,000/-each shallbe paid by the respondents No.l and 2 to respondentNo.3, that is, in all a sum of ? 1,32,000/-. The ). respondentNo.2 shall also pay a sum of^ 66,000/-to the respondentNo.4 - Ms. Bandana Maira. The counsel for the parties agree that after the aforesaidpaymentsare receivedby the petitionerand the respondentsNo.3 and 4, no outstandingof whatsoever nature will be left and the execution petition shall stand satisfied and also thatthe petitionerand the respondentsNo.3 and 4 shallhave no claim ^ whatsoeverleftagainstthe suitpropertyand/oragainstthe JudgmentDebtors. In view of the aforesaidsettlementarrived at betweenthe parties,the petitionis disposedof as satisfied. A copy ofthis order be given dasti to the counsel for the parties, as prayed. NOVEMBER 02, 2011 ak lOM-r-f-REVA KHETRAPAL, J. /STc:/.'e /c'rfxf Pase3 of 3

1-25 4- % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REENA MEHTA Through: versus UPINDER MAIRA & ORS Through: Decree Holder Petitioner in person. ..... Judgment Debtors Mr. Girdhar Govind, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate with Ms. S.Datta, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Mr. K.K.Patra, Ms. Aprajita Swarup, Advocates for the respondent No.3. Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Advocate for the respondent No.4 and Ms. Vandana Maira, R-4. COIiAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAFAL