- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 769/2011
Judgment
ORDER o/"
24.11.2011 The Petitioners are present in person and state that they are major and have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of Respondent Nos.2 to 7 and seek protection. On a notice being issued, Respondent Nos. 2 to7 are present in Court. They state that the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and since she has married of her own free will they would not interfere in her happy married life and they would also expect from her not to interfere in their lives. In view of the fact that the Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 state that they will not interfere in the peaceful life of the Petitioners, Petitioners who are present in Court state that they do not wish to press the present petition. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 24,2011 'dk'
Case details
Parties and counsel
40 $' * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 769/2011 SUFI RAIS SHAH & ANR. Petitioner Through Mr. R.K. Singh, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus Respondent Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, S.C. for State . Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with R- 2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.