Gannon Dunkerley and Company Limited v. Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited & Anr

O R D E R

¶1Learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance. He submits that the petitioner previously filed a petition in this Court, seeking relief/s identical to those sought in the present petition. In this regard he draws attention to an order dated 05.06.2023 passed in O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 193/2023 filed by the petitioner, whereby this Court rejected the prayer/s sought by the petitioner qua the very same bank guarantee with regard to which the present petition has been filed. An appeal filed against the said order was also been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court.

¶2The conduct of the petitioner in omitting to disclose the aforesaid facts, and yet seeking urgent interim relief/s is reprehensible.

¶3Confronted with the above situation, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. This is a digitally signed order. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order/s stand vacated.

SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024/at

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 393/2024 GANNON DUNKERLEY AND COMPANY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocate. Versus DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vineet Tayal and Ms. Nishtha Wadhwa, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 19.11.2024