- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 November 2011
- Bench
- M.L. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1816/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow M.L. Mehta
Judgment
a g-24 * ITt THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M .C. 181612011 & Crl.M.A. 6542120l-]- RAKESH SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. AjaY MalviYa, Advocate VCTSUS STATE(GOW. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Fizani Hussain APP for the State with Sl K.K. Mishra, PS Conaught Place. CORAM: HON',BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA o/o #r*' Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the entire amount due from the petitioner has been paid by him to respondent No.2 Bank. Counsel for respondent No.2 confirms and states to have no objection for quashing of the FIR qua the petitioner. On the similar ground, FIR against co-accused Saud Ahmed Khan was quashed,by this Court in Crl.M.C. No. 9512004 vide order dated 23'd April, 2004. ln view of what is stated above by the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for respondent No.2, the FIR No. 527l2001 U/s 4061420 IPC PS Connaught Place and the proceedings emanating therefrom qua the petitioner are quashed. The petition stands disPosed of. NOVEMBER 01, 2011 'rai' tf Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.