- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 November 2024
- Bench
- Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 902/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
20.11.2024 Ι.Α. 45592/2024 (for exemption)
¶1Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application is disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 902/2024
¶1This is a petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of six (6) months w.e.f. 12.11.2024.
¶2Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the arguments of both the parties stands concluded and the judgment has been reserved on
07.11.2024.
¶3Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. He states that he has no objection to the reliefs sought in the present petition. This is a digitally signed order. 4. In view of the no objection by the Respondent and having considered the averments in the petition, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of four (4) months from today.
¶5The petition is disposed of accordingly.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 20, 2024/msh/sk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 902/2024 & I.A. 45592/2024 JAIBIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Ms. Rinku Narula and Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Singh and Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocates for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.