VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Rajadhiraj Tirupani Vinayak Natraj Private Limited v. Facor Alloys Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
20 November 2024
Bench
Sachin Dattaauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 907/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

20.11.2024 IA No.45671/2024 (Exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 907/2024

¶3The present petition filed under Section 29A (4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeks extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award.

¶4The learned Sole Arbitrator was appointed by this Court vide order dated 10.11.2022 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 310/2022.

¶5Respective counsel for the parties submit that final arguments before the learned sole Arbitrator stands concluded and only the awardremains to be pronounced.

¶6Considering the joint request of the parties, the time period for This is a digitally signed order. completion of arbitral proceedings and making of the arbitral award is extended till 31.01.2025.

¶7The petition stands allowed in the above terms.

SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 20, 2024/cl

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 907/2024 RAJADHIRAJ TIRUPANI VINAYAK NATRAJ PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakanksah Nehra and Mr. Aniruddha Mukherjee, Advs. versus FACOR ALLOYS LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Keshav Gulati and Mr. Kanishk Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.