- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 20 November 2024
- Bench
- Amit Mahajan
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3627/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
20.11.2024
¶1The petitioner seeks police protection.
¶2It is the case of the petitioners that Respondent No. 4 has been threatening the petitioners.
¶3The pleadings indicate that Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 4 were co-habiting together in live-in relationship since the year 2019.
¶4Petitioner No. 1 appears to have married Petitioner No. 2 sometime in March, 2024.
¶5An FIR was also registered at the instance of Respondent No. 4 alleging rape on the false pretext of marriage.
¶6The present petition does not appear to be bona fide. Respondent No. 4 is the complainant and the FIR was registered against Petitioner No. 1.
¶7If the petitioner has any grievance in regard to Respondent This is a digitally signed order. No. 4, he is at liberty to contact the concerned Investigating Officer or file appropriate application before the concerned Court, however, no order can be passed in the present petition.
¶8The petition is, therefore, dismissed. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 20, 2024 "SS" This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3627/2024 & CRL.M.A. 34742/2024 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shasak Jain & Ms. Rekha Jain, Advs. (through VC) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Vikas Walia, Mr. Jatin & Mr. Anikait, Advs. SI Dhiraj Singh, PS- Shalimar Bagh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.