VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Jagatjit Brown Forman(India) Ltd v. Kerala State Beverages Corpn

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 May 2011
Bench
Manmohanauthor
Case no.
CO.APPL.(C) 54/2008

Judgment

~-. 'i~ fl l :I,, I il ! I . 'jill· ' .. . •: 1:· .·~~~.- I iJI ~l. / .. ,. . r, ., I ... ' ·- : . .. . II ' l ~ . ., ,.• !i· . . ,/ · .. :': .~·lPf' · .. ·. / . · ~ ' :1. .• . • . ·.' ..... ' . . . .- 22 to 55 . ·· ~ .· .: %· 26.05.2011 .-·_:·. I' • • • • ~ • ., . Present: Mr. ·Anil Airi, ·Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Bawa, Advocate ·, ·: for Jagatjit Industries Ltd ... · ! . ' .. ' ' ... ~ :·. ' .: . · .. Ms. Bhanita, Advqcate for respondent sp Gupta and Sons: . . ... . . . . Mr.' Haslllnat Nabe; Advocate .for respondent in Co. Appl. (C) ·: .. ,· '.': . . .. . : : ~2/2008 ~ .. ·.. . ·.. ·. ~: Shri Singh, ·Advocate for respondent in Co.· Appl. (C) 40/2008.. .. . . . · ... ·· Mr. Fazlin Anam, Advocate & Mr. V.K. Gupta, Advocate for ~· ~espondent · iri. Co. Appl. (C) 44/2008;: 45/2008, 46/2008, 01}8:·. ·~· _.. :.::-,·_ .... 47/2008,52/20.08 & 54/2008. ,. · ·' < . :· . ·. · · · · ~ .· :. Mr,. Rajiv Bakshi, A4vo~ate in Co. Appl. (c) 51i2_008. . · : · Ms. Purnima Sethi, Advocate for Official Liquidator with Mr. · S.B .. G~utam, Official Liquidator. :.. : .. . · . . .· ··+_·:, ·:· Co. Appt (C) 4/2007 in Co.:Pet.439/1999. · . . . . . , .· . · + ·.-.... Co. Appt· (C) 1/2008 in Co. ·Pet.439/1999 , . :. . . . ~--· · +-'_: -Co. Appl. (C) 5/2008 in Co. ·Pet.439/1999 ,.- ... · . · .. ::. ··. :. + .'_.··':·.-Co. 'Appl.· (C)' 7/2008 in· Co~ Pet.439/1999 · .'.:.·.: ... >-'·· ... -t.: :· . ·: Co: Appt (C) 9/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 . , - ' .. · ... ·:. , .... ,·· .. :· :+> .···<co.·Appl. (C) 11/2008 Co. Pet.439/1999 -: · ... · ... · ... · . ·.. · . ~· ... · ·. Co. Appl. (C) 14/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999. · · ·: :· .... ,~.· ~ .· +·.:·::-. . Co. Appl. (C)-15/2008 in Co: Pet.'439/1999. --_. .--~_: · :· >:-.; :, ·<:+. · ·:\,:;co>Appt· (C) 16/2008 in co.'· Pet.439/1999 · CD: ·rm.····.:~: · _..>. +><.::·:Co~ Appl. CC)" 17/2008 ~nCo; Pet.439/1999_ '"' · . + · ._:· Co. Appl. (C) 19/2008 m Co. Pet.439/1999 . ,: -: .. . +' . Co. Appl. {C) 20/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 · ... : -~. : ·: +, · ... :. Co .. Appl.. (C)' 24/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 . . .. . . \+ > -:.Co·. Appl. (C) 30/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 ·· .. ·.> ·. :. -·. + ··:_:Co. Appl. (C) 33/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999' .. · . · ... ·.· : -~h···::,._. .. Co. Appl. (C) 35/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 ,· ·, ~·· · .. ·_::·. · .. :: +: .. > Co. Appl. (C) 40/2008 in Co. Pet."439/1999 · ._. · .. · · . :. :_ : .. : ·:-: ~ ~ _.;. ·: · Co>Appt (C) 42/2008-in Co~· Pet:439/1999 .-. . · .... · ::_~' ... ·.-~··:·-~-:,.-Co. Appl. CC) 43/2008 in:·co:Pet~439/1999_._ · · .. : . , .. :. ->: .. ; ..... ·.:+: \:···,Co. Appl. {C) 44/2008 in Co.· Pet.439/1999 ·. · · · ... · . · .-. ·f.:.~ .. ~ ·.Co. Ap.pl. (C) 45/2008 in' Co: Pet.439/1999 ... ·. :· .. ··. :.+: ... ·co. Appl. (C) 46/2008 in Co.-Pet.439/1999 : ' ... : ~ .... ~·- .:·· .·.. . .-;·:~ : ~. . . ' .. '. ;;: · . . . , ·.~ . . ' ' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ' '~.. . ... . , . . ·:: .. ~ ·• .' +.. ·:·.Co. App1. (C) 47/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 . : · :. ·. +.· .. · ·co. Appl. (C) 48/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999. · . . · ... : · .. . +. ·. ,'·-' Co~·Appl. (C) 50/2008. in Co. Pet.439/1999 · : . . ·: +.:· · :: co·.··AppL (C) 51/2008 in .. Co.'.Pet.439/1999: . .. · .:·:. ·. .+ ... :~ ·co. Appl. (C) 52/2008 in Co .. Pet.439/1999 . . : >:.. ··. + ... -::Co. Appl. (C) 54/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 .· · ·. ·· . · . + · · ·· Co .. Appl. (C) 55/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 .: .·· ·. ·. :· :·:. + ... Co. Appt (C) 58/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 -· ;·_ · +. Co. Appl. (C) 62/2008 in Co.·Pet.439/1999 .: · · · .... + · :: Co. Appl.. (C) 63/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 : .·. · · . + .. · Co. Appl. (C) 65/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 .. ,:· . }-:. Co. Appl. (C) 66/2008 in Co. Pet.439/1999 . · *. · ·: ._(In tl~e matter ofM/s .. Jagatjit Brown Forman (India) Ltd.) fi't.''l'nl ~~· . · · · \Lt. Jll.il ..•. " .... .. •' .. ·~ . '. : '. : . . •. ._ . . "', ~. . . . ; . '·· On 23rd J\1ay, 2011~ this Court had passed the f~llowing order:- "Mr. ·A nil Airi, learned counsel along with Mr. ·siddharth .Bawa; learned counsel for _Nils. Jagatjit Industries states that ·the·. _company (In liqn.) .was a joint venture between Mls. Brown· Forman Maur~tius Limited and Mls. Jagatjit Industries. He states that the aforesaid joint venture had .. ;. . . ·turned (sour' ~ay· back in the. year, 1999.: He also states . ... · . · ... · · .. thai this Court vide detailed ·order dated 19th December, · · · .. -'· . · : 2003 ·appointed a Pr~visional Liquidator under Section . . .. · ·. 433(/) ofthe Companies Act; 1956. · Mr: Ani! Airi, learned · : < . qqunsel conterzds that ever since then, the foreign company :. :·: / : · :· nain~ly. Nils. Brown ··Forman Mauritius Limited.· has not " . . ·:; -~ . · :··:· ·: . shown .any :interest. in .the ~ompany (I~ liqn.).. He also states that Nils. Jagatjit Industries is also not interested in '· . reviving this company . : .. ,. .. . ,• ·] also asked Ms. Purnima Sethi,. learn~d counsel for ·.>; ·Official Liquidator as to whether any amqunt is due and ... .. · ·.··payable to. any secured or unsecured. creditor or to any ... ;·_ ::·: · ··. . . . · ·. . · · :_ workinan. She states that though n·a claim has been invited · · · ·.;:· .· .... · : __ ·~ · ..... , .. froJ~·th~ public at la~ge, bu{till date neither any-workman . : '. :·. . . ..-: ~ . ·. . .. rzor any secured or un_secured creditor ,ha~ filed any claim · ·. . · .... . :. ·. · . _. ... ·· · .. ·. . ·_: . with (he Official Liquicj.ator. : • ;- • • ':

¶4• • • • • • • ·~ ~ ' . \ : . • .• • . . • ) !· . .. . .. . :. · :_ · . ·. · · . · ·If t~is is ·the positio~, then· I fail to: Z:tnderstand as to why !• . .. ·· .. ;, . . .. ·. •,•,' . • ··~ f • . ·. ~ ~' . . , . , .. .. : > ... ' .- • ~.. • • '· ,· . ' ~ :' ··~ . · .. ·.·. ···:' '\ .·.; · .. '. ,, the ·official Liquidator is pursu_ing various claims against third parties. at great cost because even. if the Official Liquidator were S"?tCCessful in recovering. the money, the .. ; sam~ would; be 'refunded back to. the . contributories-who ' . . . '• are not interested in pursuing the proceedings any further. · :.· .. : .. ·.: · ... ·· · . , . ··.Consequently, .I d,irect ·the Offic~al Li~uidator to be .. ·. · ...... · .·. · · .. · · · · p~rsonally pres_ent before this Court on 261 May, 2011. . . ~~. . . ~ .- :. :.- ·. : : · · · · .. ·. · .. List the matters on i61h May,· 20JJ. "· .. .. . . . . . ' . • • · ' .. f. · ·. · · · ~ · ID:. pursuanc.e to the said order~ Mr .. S.B .. Gautmn, Official Ol)(l): .... " ~ ~ . . ' ' . . . '• · ... ' .. .. ·. '-··~. .• ,•o o I : . . ' .... fo • · ··. . ·Liquidator is personally present in Court .. He ·confirms that claims had . . : b~en invited in the Y~ar, 2~05 ~d ad~ertisem~nts ~ere published. in . . . ' ; . :· ~, ~Statesm~n' (~nglish) and 'Dainik iagran' (Hindi) on 29~ December, . ... · . . ' . . . . 2o.o:S. · .. He ·points ·ou~ that· d~spite. th~ hi.st ·d~te. of filing of the· claims . : : . ' :-· . . . •, . ~ . . ' . . ~ " -· ' . . . .:.:_·: :. . . ·. ··:: : :: . be~g .. 3l.s_t Jan~ar)r, _:2006;: no. ciaim either:· from· any se~ured or .. ' . ·. . . . .. : . '. . . ~ . . .. : '; ·~ ~~. . · .. ::::::· · .. :·::· ·. . . :.·::, lins.ec~ed creditor or froin any :Workmen ha~ been received. · · . ' : .. < .' .. ~.S.B. .Gau~,6fficial Liquidator states that a sum of • '. • • • • ' • • ~ • • " ' • • ~ .: ..... • t~ .... • ....... ~. • • ~ '::·~ ,. • ' ' &D~,>· :~::.'_ > ..... ·~· ':.~~:4,oo.,O,OO/~ ha~ be~n r~co;ered from s~le of two vehicles and frorn .· " . ' . . : ·. t . .'; . ~~me decrees passed under .section .446 of the Companies Act, 1956. . ,. . .. · ·:·. ·· .. ·. :·-· ;·. · · . ·. · .. : . . He also. stat~s that in ca_se _:no~ices ·have to b~ senred up~m ·the unserved ·. ·. > ' .•. , ' • · · J •. ·.·. · ~~spo~d~n~s in th~ ;arious applicatiOn: lis~d tod'IY and in those , ·i· :_. ··.-.:·:· · .. : . <· .... 'pe~cling befo~~ the Regi~tra~~ _th~· official 'Liquidator would. have to . .. >··: ... _: '·_,. . ':· ':.· ·.·. '.: .. : .·; .. ' ·.·: . . .· . ' : ·. . ·.' . . '.' :.:\· .. ;\ . . · ... > _· ·._}~~~r ~~p~ndi~e ~?~h Rs.},OO,OO_OI_~·:·. : ·: : : . . . . . '' •' ·;...... ... . . . " · .-: .. .':.·· ... - .··.: ..... ::·: .. ···.:Mi . .'9autam, Official Liquidator further candidly admits that ' { ' ": . . ( . -:. ~ . \ . ' ~ .. ~ ' . . .. , ... : ·- . ·-.~ : . . ~·· ~ .. '· -·· .- . ~ :' . .' . , .. ' . . · .. . ' ··. ,. ... . .- '· . '• . ~ . ' •' . ·, ... '.; .. · ~ ~ . . . ' ... \ . · ... -· . ,, : ' ' '· .. "' ~ ' : : .. :·_-.-~ .· .. :-:··._·. ·. ··:·: ;:_.:.· .. ·the iedge~ e~~ies._on: the· basis ofwhichpresent_recovecy proceedings , . ' , .· .. · ·: · .•.•. .' ·under ~~cti~n 446 ofthe:CompaniesA~, 1956 have been filed are not -'_:::::~:. :_ .-·: ... ;· .;:· ·. _;·: ~upported by:~y-·primary" docm?i~nt. like a voucher. He also states · · ·:: ·· ... ·: .~ · · .~· :. · · that rio' debit or credit notes are a~ailable with the Official Liquidator. ~ . . . .. ' ·~ . ·.. . : . . . . . . . ~ . ' ' . . ' ; . ' ; ._ . . . ·. . . . . _. .' .. · ... : ·. ::::·:: · ··:· · .. · · .. · . ~. Ga~~~ ·la~tly._states that even if money de.crees were to be ' ·~ . .. ~ . ~ . . ·~ ' • " • •'' •• .... · :·:. ·,. ·'passed by . this: Co~, it would be very_ diffi~ult to the Official .,. .. . ' . Liquidator·· to ·execute the said recovery decree as most of the ~' . ".· respondents . being Annual. Indian Made Foreign Liquor Licence '•• '. . . . . ' .. Ol, (1]'' :' H . ~· , . '• .II,·. , . ; ':'. ' . .. ·, ', : '·. < ' ' holder~ ~ould not b~ traceable .. ' . .. ,. ' .. : ''; .: . I' I • • ·, .. . ·:· . .. . ' . ' · .. · \-· ._: ·;. . ·:~. ~il Airi,: ie~ed couns~r'-for.'J~g~tjit. Br~wn Forman . . - . .. ' "'; . . · .. > t". • •.• ., --~ . : • : :· .. · : ~··:· (India) Ltd .. ~n-instruction~·ofMr. K.K. Kohli,.ColTI.pany Secretary of ••. •.···· ·~ ' · .· .. ·. ·:., : i ag~Wt:Brcivm Forman(India) Ltd. ~~~s the fact that there are no .... ·- ' .. ~ >·. ·:· .. · :. ··_:: · · -:..·~~cuni~ -~r:~~ecu~~-cl. ~i~dit~;s of tl:ie~company ·in liquidation and no ... . :·, ', ·.-~~~:>: . .-:..-·' .· :; .:. . ' ·. " · ... ·. . .. '' . ' . .: .. · ·: ,.· .:. · . :: : ·<.-:.further ques are payable to any.workman .. He also reaffirms the fact Cl}1!l• : ·,; · ·,: thai nod~ of the joint venture partners i~ interested in reviving the . ' ' t • •• ':-:.~ .. :·:.': '.·~ajority ofth~ 'unserved re'spondents.'. . . ; . ·. r, ',,o•r '', . ~. . ~ ... . . . . :. ; . ~ ·. "~ ·: . -· ' ,. . : ·, .. : :·:: .. ·.· ·: ·· ._; , I~ vie~ of the ·afores~id stat~m:~nt .by .the Officlai Liquidator ·.- '. ': ', ·~ .. , , ; , :, : • ''' • ... • • ,' ',, , • · .. : • . ; ', , , , ' , ' I • , , .• '.'' . ' ' ' • • , , ' .· _:· :>· . .- ~-=·. ,. .·. · : ... an~·¥r: Anil Airi, learned counsel for Jagatjit Brown Fonnan (India) ~ J ' • • • ' • • :. • : • • - ' • • ~\· ··-::·:· >·.:.<::;· ·. · .. :.::: ._. · ··Ltd.:: ~s. ~eli'· ~s the. fact. that primacy doc~nent~: lik~ invoic_es. and . ' ~ .. ·. . . • •• ': • •• •' • ••• .-~· ·~ ' f ,' ' ~ ' '" 't .• : ,;~ '... • ~ . " . . :.·· ~ . ',• , . . . ' ' •. ·: ' . ... :: •• :\· > ·.: f ........ . .. .. . .... ' . ~. ' .... ,·' .:_ '·. ' ., ' . ' ... . . ' . ~ . vouchers are. not availabl~ and further' the amount recovered in the ' . p~~~eni proceedings would be used to repay, the contributories who are : ·. .... · . •' ... . . . . ' . ' . . ' I ' ' • • '. ·. : :· :·< . ' ·_ .. ·: . ·. ' ' not interested i~. pursuing' the present. prqceedings as is apparent from " .... . . - '·.-·f ·· . . , ' . . .... _., . . ' :· ·. this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in carcying on with the present proceedings .. · ·. · . · · . · . . ':. :

¶1• ,,, . . . . . . '. ~ . . . - :. . . Acc~rdingly,:the pres.ent applications are di~11;1iss~d . ,' l,. •• · ·_ The· R~gi~try is. directed to list all pending ·applications filed . '. : ' : . ... ~ .. >< ':··_under Se~tion· 446 of the Companies ·.Act in the case of M/s. Jagatjit . . ' . _. ___ : .·:· . ::· .-· ._: ··:_ ·::: .. · Bro:wn Fo~an, (IJ:1.dia) ~td.'·b-efore ~~~ Court ~n 03rd June, 2~ 11. . ~ . . ' . . " . . . ·· · ·· ·- -- : . ~-,~ · ·. _:_. :·· -:· ·.: 'Let a e~py_ ofthi~ order be pla~ed on all CAs files pertaining to • : :· • • ' • • • . ' • • : • • ~ • ' •' : • ; • • • I • • .· :: · .. ·.: :\: ·\ .· ·. . :· ... :· >.-'. the co~pany in li~uidation. . ' ' ,• . ' . ~ .. . . . · :,_ : . ~ ~ . . . ..... · ... ;. ' ' . ~ ... ,• '· ' .· . ~ ,,' .... ~ ·. ' ........ ' .. ' ·.. .. .. :- ' • . • t.'·. ! .• ... . t,• ~. . . " • .. i • < •' -...... .. , . . '" .. . . · . .. ·: :_- ;.:·:.- ·MAY 26,2011 :. · ,. '>- • • • t . 'JS . . " . ' . . . . .·. . . ~· . . .~ . : . ' ' ' : ',, • t ' ' I ' ' : '"1' I' : ' I' ~ . • ·. ~ •, . .. . . : ' • • ' I ' "~ '. ' ' • ,: ··: . ', . ' . " . . ::: ', .· . • ·_,.- •• ··-: •••• '!., •• ' ..... , . ~ . . ~. . . . . - . .. . . ... ... . . I'. • ~..... • • • • • • ' ., • : " • ' .• { •• . . · .. : :. . ~- ... ' ~-. ':. . . . ·.: '• ·-.~ .. : ' ~ ... . ·" ' . ···' ... ' . :' .... ~~ . ' " .. . . . · ·. .. . ' .~.' . . • • ' .... •' . . ·. ~ .. . . .... . ' ~. . .. ; ) '. ' ' •' ... . . . . ~-. . :. . .. ' .. ,· . . . ' .. • ..... ~ . . ~ . • I '' • .· ... . . . ' . . .... . ; . · .. ~ . . . '

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.