VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Pushpal Kumar Mishra v. Vice Chancellor, Jamia Milia Islamia University & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
30 May 2013
Bench
G.S.Sistaniauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 3783/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow G.S.Sistani

Judgment

ORDER

30.05.2013 Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 27.9.2012 by which he was debarred for a period of three years. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage petitioner would be satisfied if an opportunity of hearing is granted to him, as he could not attend the hearing on account of the fact that he was indisposed. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner would have no objection if the hearing is granted to him in the month of july, 2013. Counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same, subject to the condition that petitioner will not press his relief for sitting in the examination in the month of june, 2013. Accordingly, respondent will grant a personal hearing to the petitioner, to enable the petitioner to explain his stand and thereafter a fresh order will be passed. In view of the stand taken by counsel for the parties, the present petition and the application stand disposed of. G.S.SISTANI, J MAY 30, 2013. ssn Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3783/2013 & CM.7098/2013 % PUSHPAL KUMAR MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Binay Kumar, Advocate versus VICE CHANCELLOR, jAMIA MILIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY & ANR. .. ... Respondent Through: Mr.Rohit Gandhi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.