VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

Rajbala v. Pawan Kumar Dagar

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 November 2008
Bench
Shiv Narayan Dhingraauthor
Case no.
C.R.P. 90/2008

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Shiv Narayan Dhingra

Judgment

ORDER

27.Lr.2008 None appears for the Petitioner. . ln this case the petitioner had first filed "No Objection" before the Probate Court in a probate case filed on the basis of a Will. After filing of "No Objection", she made an application to withdraw her "No Objection" and the trial court disallowed that application by impugned order. I consider that trial court rightly disallowed the application. A person cannot blow hot and cold simultaneously. The plea taken by % Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the and N OVEM B ER rS petitioner that she was offered some mon therefore she wanted to withdraw "No O Petition is dismissed. SH IV NARAYAN D GRA,J 27,2008 was not given is not tenable. J y which a

Case details

Parties and counsel

\^ -'L 3..* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI c.R.P. 90/2008 RAJ BALA Through: None. VCTSUS ifrHl)rtuMAR DAGAR ""' Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.