- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 November 2008
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- C.R.P. 90/2008
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Shiv Narayan Dhingra
Judgment
ORDER
27.Lr.2008 None appears for the Petitioner. . ln this case the petitioner had first filed "No Objection" before the Probate Court in a probate case filed on the basis of a Will. After filing of "No Objection", she made an application to withdraw her "No Objection" and the trial court disallowed that application by impugned order. I consider that trial court rightly disallowed the application. A person cannot blow hot and cold simultaneously. The plea taken by % Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the and N OVEM B ER rS petitioner that she was offered some mon therefore she wanted to withdraw "No O Petition is dismissed. SH IV NARAYAN D GRA,J 27,2008 was not given is not tenable. J y which a
Case details
Parties and counsel
\^ -'L 3..* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI c.R.P. 90/2008 RAJ BALA Through: None. VCTSUS ifrHl)rtuMAR DAGAR ""' Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.