Rajender Singh Negi & Ors v. Pk Tripathy & Ors

ORDER %

01.11.2011

¶1Counsel for the petitioner states that an error has crept in the memo of parties. She states that the present contempt petition has been preferred by petitioner No.3, Sh. Dushyant Kumar Garg alone and not by the other petitioners inasmuch in the judgment subject matter of the present petition, relief was granted only to petitioner No.3 herein.

¶2The present petition is confined to petitioner No.3. Amended memo of parties be filed by the petitioner in the course of the day.

¶3The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition praying inter alia for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the judgment dated 29,11.2010, passed in a batch of matters including W.P.(C) No.5396-98/2005 CONT.CAS(C) 425/2011 Page 1 of 2. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. entitled, 'Raiender Sinah Neai & Ors. Vs.National Capital Territory of Delhi through' Secretary".

¶4At the outset, counsel for the respondent/GNCT of Delhi states that the department is in the process of implementing the aforesaid judgment and it is expected that the process shall be completed within two weeks from today.

¶5In view of the aforesaid submission made by counsel for the respondents, counsel for the petitioners states that she does not wish to press this petition. The same is accordingly disposed of with directions to the respondents to ensure that necessary compliances of the aforesaid judgment is made preferably within a period of four weeks from today. HIMA KOHLI,J NOVEMBER 01, 2011 'anb' CONT.CAS(C) 425/2011 Page 2 of 2.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 425/2011 RAJENDER SINGH NEGI & ORS Petitioners Through: l^s. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. versus PK TRIPATHY & ORS Respondents Through: i^Ir. S.Q. Kazim, Adv. with l^lr. Alim l^izaj, Adv. CORAIVI: HON'BLE iV|S. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI