Sanjeev Garg v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors

O R D E R %

14.11.2025

¶1The present writ petition has filed seeking directions to the Municipal The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), to take action against respondent no. 10 for raising unauthorized construction in property bearing Khasra no. 1161/1 Min, Village Mehrauli, New Delhi-110030.

¶2During the course of arguments, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 10 has handed over to this Court details of the call record received from the petitioner with the number 9811107065 to submit that the petitioner has been calling up one of the associates of respondent no. 10 in order to blackmail the respondent no. 10. The record of the call handed over to this Court, is reproduced as under: -

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the MCD submits that a suit with respect to the land in question is pending before Saket Court filed on behalf The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. of respondent no. 10 against the Delhi Development Authority ("DDA"). It is submitted that the petitioner herein has also filed an application of impleadment in the said suit.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the MCD further submits that the land in question has been inspected. He submits that no construction work was found to be carried out on the land in question.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the DDA, i.e., respondent no. 2 has handed over to this Court, photographs of the land in question. The said photographs are reproduced as under: - The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶6By referring to the aforesaid photographs, learned counsel appearing for the DDA submits that no construction is going on the land in question. He further submits that as of now there is no encroachment on the DDA land.

¶7Considering the submissions made before this Court, no orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.

¶8In normal course, this Court would have imposed cost on the petitioner considering the conduct of the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is a practising advocate, this Court refrains from imposing any cost. Nevertheless, the petitioner is cautioned and shall refrain from undertaking any such activities.

¶9Noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with all pending application is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2025/ng The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16634/2025 & CM APPL. 68300/2025 SANJEEV GARG .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sharique Hussain & Ms. Kirti Garg, Advs. for R-9. (M: 7899682206) Email: sharique@rrjassociate.com Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, SC, DJB with Ms. Malvi Balyan, Adv. for R-6/DJB M: 9811112863 Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav & Ms. Preeti Gothwal, Advs. for R-4 & 5. M: 9999388384 & Email: yadavkraj1974@gmail.com Ms. Akansha Gupta, SPC for MCD. Email: advakankshagupta@hotmail.com Mr. Nitin Kumar, Panel Counsel for MCD for R-1 to 8. M: 9823566899 Email: kumarniti43@gmail.com Ms. Kirti Garg, Adv. for R-10. M: 7899682206 Email: kirti@rrjassociate.com Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA