- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2025
- Bench
- Jyoti Singh
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 16679/2025
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2025
¶1This writ petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- "(1) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus Quashing the respondent no.1's E-Auction notice as per notice dt.20.09.2025, REF NO. CB/SAR/BB/13-2/(8-6)SEPT/2025/09,to the respondent no.2, 3 and 4 with regard to the secured asset i.e. WZ-49-A, (PLOT NO.-27), including roof built on land measuring 260 Sq. Yards. Out of Khasra no. Rectangle No.-6/12 Kila Portion and Khasra No.-12/7/1 and 12/4 portion situated in the area of Village Choukhandi, Shyama Prashad Mukherjee Park, New Delhi-110018 till the 1/3rd share of the petitioner is not determined and released in favour of the petitioner.
(2) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to suspend any further action on the E-Auction notice dt.20.09.2025 REF NO. CB/SAR/BB/13-2/(8-6)SEPT/2025/09 till pending the petition of the petitioner.
(3) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to release the 1/3rd share of the petitioner in the secured asset i.e.WZ-49-A, (PLOT NO.-27), including roof built on land measuring 260 Sq. Yards. Out of Khasra no. This is a digitally signed order. W.P.(C) 16679/2025
Rectangle No.-6/12 Kila Portion and Khasra No.-12/7/1 and 12/4 portion situated in. the area of Village Choukhandi, Shyama Prashad Mukherjee Park, New Delhi-110018 being a legitimate legal owner in the same."
¶2After canvassing some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies.
¶3Writ petition along with the pending application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
¶4It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
JYOTI SINGH, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
W.P.(C) 16679/2025 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16679/2025 & CM APPL. 68449/2025 PUSHPINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.S. Bajwa, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Mr. Saksham Saxena and Ms. Anjali Solanki, Advocates. versus AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishrra, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Ms. Poonam Shukla, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.