Sarvesh Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Medical Superintendent Satyawadi Raja Harish Chandra

O R D E R %

11.11.2025 I.A. 27861/2025 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 929/2025

¶1This is a petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a further period of 3 months for making and publishing the final Award.

¶2Ms. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the parties have almost concluded the final arguments.

¶3For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶4Ms. Garg, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that she has no objection to the petition being allowed.

¶5For the reasons stated above, I am of the view that sufficient cause has been explained for the delay. The petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 3 months from today. This is a digitally signed order. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 11, 2025/AS This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 929/2025 SARVESH SECURITY SERVICES PVT LTD ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sneha Singh, Mr. Uday Malhotra, Advs. versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT SATYAWADI RAJA HARISH CHANDRA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Mr. Agam Rajput, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH