Manoj Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors

O R D E R %

12.11.2025

¶1Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶2For redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has made several complaints to the MCD which has been enclosed alongwith the writ petition.

¶3Mr. Sabharwal, learned Standing Counsel representing the MCD, has stated that the complaints made by the petitioner shall be attended to and an appropriate action which will be warranted under law shall also be taken up.

¶4Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the appropriate authority of the MCD to consider and take appropriate decision on the complaints made by the petitioner, expeditiously. We further direct that in case any action is warranted on the complaints preferred by the petitioner, the This is a digitally signed order. same shall also be taken by the MCD, within a period of two months from today, of course, after giving a notice to the party who may be affected by such intended action.

¶5The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025 kct This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17110/2025 MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S. Jadhav and Ms. Manika Arora, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal and Mr. Kushagra Malik, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocate for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA