Gaurav Enterprises v. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital & Anr

O R D E R %

12.11.2025

¶1Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶2For ventilation of its grievances, the petitioner/organization has represented its cause to the tendering authority by means of a representation dated 08.11.2025.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel representing the GNCTD Mr. Sameer Vashisht, on instructions, has stated that today the technical bids are likely to be opened, however all the representations received including the one submitted by the petitioner which is available at page '107' of the writ petition shall be considered and decided before the technical bid is opened.

¶4Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the This is a digitally signed order. statement made by Mr. Vashisht based on the instructions received from Dr. Pratima Prasad (AMS, HS-III) G.T.B. Hospital.

¶5The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner as well.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025 yrj

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17151/2025, CM APPL. 70541/2025 & CM APPL. 70542/2025 GAURAV ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Harshit Singh, Mr. Anant Dev and Mr. Hage Nanya, Advocates. versus GURU TEG BAHADUR HOSPITAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ranjana Kumair, Advocate for UOI. Dr. Pratima Prasad (AMS HS-III) and Mr. Pushp Raj Yadav Legal Assistant, GTB Hospital. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil) with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA