Ramakant and Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Deepti Gaur Mukherjee & Anr

O R D E R %

13.11.2025

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2The present petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers:- "A. Initiate the Contempt of Court proceedings against the Contemnors/ Respondents for the non-compliance of Judgment/Order dated 28.07.2025 passed in LPA 183 0f 2025; and further B. Direct the Contemnors/Respondents to credit immediately, into the bank account as mentioned in Para 8 of the petition, the excess additional fees of Rs.3,200 charged on SRN R25078403 from the petitioner along with bank charges incurred on such payments @ 1%+18% GST amounting Rs.37.76 SRN R25078403 along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of payment of such amounts till the date of actual refund to petitioner; and C. Impose an exemplary cost on the Respondents; and D. Pass any other or further order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

¶3Vide judgment dated 28.07.2025, the learned Division Bench of this This is a digitally signed order. Court, in LPA 183/2025 had passed the following directions:- "20. In that view of the matter, we allow the appeals and set aside the impugned judgment dated 27.01.2025 and thereby direct the respondents to:

(i) calculate the additional fee at the rate of Rs.100/- per day for every day delay beyond 30.11.2019 in terms of Circular no. 13/2019 till the date of submission as the case maybe, and;

(ii) consequently, refund the additional fee paid by the appellant companies, if found in excess, within a period of 6 weeks from date."

¶4Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and 2, on instructions of Mr. Vyomesh Sheth, Deputy ROC and Mr. Vijaya Sinha Reddy, Deputy ROC, who are present in Court today, submits that file is under process and the compliance of the aforesaid directions will be made within three weeks. The aforesaid statement is taken on record.

¶5In view of the aforesaid undertaking, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same, if the undertaking is not complied with.

¶6Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

AMIT SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025/nk/db

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THEHIGHCOURTOF DELHIATNEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1702/2025 RAMAKANT AND CO. PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Adv. versus DEEPTI GAUR MUKHERJEE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, SPC with Mr. Akash Dubey, Adv. with Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, GP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA