Neelam Mahajan Singh v. Raj Chopra

ORDER "h

31.08.2010 This second revision has been filed by the same petitioner as in Criminal Revision petition No.423 of 2010 against the same order. It is stated by counsel that he filed two revisions against the same order at the advice of the Registry. Perhaps counsel for the petitioner is supposed to know more law than a clerk sitting at the Registry and should have told that only one revision was sufficient and he need not file two revisions against the same order. This revision petition being duplicacy of the first revision petition is not required to be kept on Board. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn' l SHIV -WINGRA,J. AUGUST 31,2010 .AA' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

( $-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + crl. Rev. P. No.424l2010 & crl. M.A. Nos.13641-1364312010 NEELAM MAHAJAN SINGH ""' Petitioner Through: Mr' Mukul Talwar, Advocate' VEISUS RAJ CHOPRA ""' ResPondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA