VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Fitness for India v. M/S Suridhi Commercial Infra Pvt. Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
13 November 2025
Bench
Jasmeet Singhauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 936/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

13.11.2025 I.A. 28280/2025 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 936/2025

¶1This is a petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a further period of 1 year for making and publishing the Award.

¶2Mr. Bagaria, learned counsel of petitioner, stated that only 1 witness is remaining to be examined and the matter is at the stage of final arguments.

¶3For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶4Mr. Sethi, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the petition being allowed.

¶5I am satisfied that a sufficient cause has been shown.

¶6Hence, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended upto 1 year from today to conclude the arbitration proceedings.

¶7The period from 30.09.2025 till today stands regularized.

¶8The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 936/2025 M/S FITNESS FOR INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ghanisht Bagaria, Adv. versus M/S SURIDHI COMMERCIAL INFRA PVT. LTD ...Respondent Through: Mr. Kashish Sethi, Ms. Mohona Sarkar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.