VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Parmod Alias Pintu v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2025
Bench
Vikas Mahajanauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 8069/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2025 CRL.M.C. 33686/2025

¶1This is an application filed on behalf of petitioner seeking condonation of 70 days delay in re-filing the petition.

¶2For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed.

¶3Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 8069/2025 and CRL.M.A. No. 33685/2025

¶4The present petition has been filed on behalf of petitioner under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 158/2021 under Section 354/354(B)/506/509 IPC registered at PS-Lodi Colony on the ground that the parties have resolved their differences amicably. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶5The brief facts of the case are that the aforesaid FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent no.2 wherein she had alleged misbehaviour by the petitioner.

¶6During pendency of the proceedings, with the intervention of family and friends, the parties have resolved all their disputes amicably without any coercion or pressure.

¶7The complainant is present in Court. On a query posed by the Court, she states that she has settled the matter with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the criminal proceedings.

¶8Issue notice. Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, learned APP for the State accepts notice.

¶9Petitioner, as well as, respondent no. 2, are present in Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel, as well as, by SI Priyanta.

¶10Respondent no.2, on a query posed by the Court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.

¶11In view of the fact that the petitioner as well as respondent no.2 have amicably settled their disputes, and regard being had to the statement made by the complainant, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served in continuation of criminal proceedings and it will be an exercise in futility.

¶12It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.

¶13Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No. 158/2021 under Section 354/354(B)/506/509 IPC registered at PS-Lodi Colony alongwith all other proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.

¶14The petition along with pending application stands disposed of in the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. above terms.

¶15Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 14, 2025/jg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8069/2025 PARMOD ALIAS PINTU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Gupta, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Priyanta, PS-Lodhi Colony. Ms. Kirti Aggarwal, Advocate for R2 with respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.