M/S Rose Valley Infrastructures Private Limited v. M/S Dlf Limited & Anr

ORDER %

19.06.2013 lA Nos. 9943/2013 and 9944/2013 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. y OMP 596/2013 and 597/2013 Learned counsel for the petitionersubmitsthat the present petitions have become infructuous since the bank guarantees have already been encashed. Needless to say, the petitioneris at liberty to agitate the incorrect invocationof the bank guaranteesbeforethe Arbitrator. No further orders are required to be passed. The petitions stand disposedof. a-— SANJEEV SACHDEVA,J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 19,2013 sv

$-38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 596/2013 M/S ROSE VALLEY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr.Sumanta De and Mr.A.K.Mehta, Advocates versus M/S DLF HOTELS AND APARTMENTS PVT LTD & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Varun Kumar and Ms.Saloni Chaudhary. + O.M.P. 597/2013 M/S ROSE VALLEY INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr.Sumanta De and Mr.A.K.Mehta, Advocates versus M/S DLF LIMITED & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr.SandeepSethi, Sr. Advocatewith Mr.Varun Kumar and Ms.Saloni Chaudhary. CORAM; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VACATION BENCH(S.B.)(Jr.)