VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Horseshoe Retail and Holdings Pvt Ltd v. Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 June 2013
Bench
Siddharth Mridulauthor
Case no.
O.M.P. 600/2013

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Siddharth Mridul

Judgment

ORDER %

24.06.2013 On the last date of hearing counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had stated that the petitioner wants to vacate the subject premises. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that they have no objection to taking over possession as well as handing over the goods which are lying or affixed in the subject premises, but a Local Commissioner be appointed for the said purpose. Accordingly, Mr. S.P.Singh, Joint Registrar, Delhi High Court (Mobile No.9910390959) is appointed as the Local Commissioner to ensure the smooth transition of vacant possession of the said premises from the petitioner to the respondent after making an inventory of the goods lying therein. The Local Commissioner shall ensure peaceful handing over of the possession of the premises to the respondent without any hindrance by or on behalf of the » respondents.The Local Commissionershall also be entitledto obtain^^eiice assistance if the same would be considered necessary for the execution of the directions of this Court. The fee of the Local Commissioner is fixed at Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to be paid by the petitioner. The Local commissioner shall execute the commission on 27.06.2013 after giving necessary notice to counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. The Local Commissioner shall flirnish his report to the Court. It is made clear that this is a consent order With the above direction the petition is disposed of. All pending applications also stand disposed of. _ qL— SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 24, 2013 mk

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 600/2013 HORSESHOERETAILAND HOLDINGSPVT LTD Petitioner Through: Mr. DhruvaBhagat,Advocate. versus AMBIENCE DEVELOPERSAND INFRASTRUCTUREPVT LTD & Respondents Through: Mr. DhruvKapur andMs. Megha Bansiwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.