- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 June 2013
- Bench
- Siddharth Mridul
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 989/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Siddharth Mridul
Judgment
ORDER %
24.06.2013 Priyanka Jain, petitionerNo.l and DevenberKumar, petitionerNo.2 have got married as per their own free will and wishes. Mr. O.P.Saxena, counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners state that the petitioners apprehend grave threat to their lives and liberty at the hands of the family of petitioner No.l. The petitioners accordingly pray for police protection. Ms. Priyanlca Kapoor, Advocate appearing on behalf of the State submits that the police shall provide adequateprotection to the petitioners. In the circumstances, SHO, Police Station-Farsh Bazar, Delhi is directed to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners after assessing the threat perceptions. The petitioners shall also be provided with a telephone number of a police officer who they can contactin the event of any threat or apprehension. Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Withthe abovedirectionsthepetitionis disposedof. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. JUNE 24, 2013 rak cl SIDimARTH MRIDUL (VACATION JUDGE)
Case details
Parties and counsel
f $-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 989/2013 PRIYANKA JAIN & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr. O.P.Saxena, Advocate with Mr. Deepak Arora and Ms. Sonia Chopra, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.