M/S Aluminium Udyog v. Parnika Commercial and Estate Pvt. Ltd

O R D E R %

17.11.2025 I.A. 28651/2025 Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 943/2025

¶1This is a petition filed under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 6 months for concluding the arbitral proceedings and passing the final award.

¶2Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel of the petitioner, states that the delay occurred due to the fact that the petitioner had filed for additional documents.

¶3For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶4Mr. Narula, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that he has no objection to the petition being allowed.

¶5For the reasons noted above, I am of the view that sufficient cause has This is a digitally signed order. been explained for the delay. The petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 6 months from today.

¶6The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/AS This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 943/2025 M/S ALUMINIUM UDYOG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Chauhan, Adv. versus PARNIKA COMMERCIAL AND ESTATE PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mrs. Rinku Narula, Mr. Anugrah Ekka, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH