- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 November 2025
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 8167/2025
Judgment
O R D E R %
18.11.2025
¶1Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of the Complaint and to challenge the summoning Order dated 07.10.2022 whereby the Petitioner has been summoned under Section 138 NI Act.
¶2The basic ground on which the summoning Order has been challenged is that the Petitioner is neither the signatory nor in any way involved in issuance of cheque for which the Complaint has been filed against the husband.
¶3Essentially, it is the summoning Order which has been challenged on merits.
¶4Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is suffering from Cancer, he may be exempted from physical appearance before the learned Trial Court. This is a digitally signed order. 5. The Petitioner is at liberty to move the appropriate Application before the learned Trial Court to seek exemption.
¶6The Petition alongwith pending Applications, is disposed of accordingly with liberty to the Complainant to approach the Court of Sessions to challenge the summoning Order, which is on merit.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 N
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8167/2025, CRL.M.A. 34122/2025, CRL.M.A. 34123/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34124/2025' MRS TARAN OJHA @ TARANG OJHA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Surat Singh, Mr. Tejaswin Suri, Mr. Rishabh Singh and Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocates versus MR ARUN MALHROTRA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.