Spacio Interspace v. Te Hospitality and Estates Ltd

O R D E R %

19.11.2025

¶1This is a petition filed under Section 29A (4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator by a further period of 6 months for making and publishing the final Award.

¶2Ms. Mundhra, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the proceedings were delayed initially due to the father of the claimant being unwell.

¶3For the said reasons, issue notice.

¶4Mr. Mathew, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the petition being allowed.

¶5I am satisfied that a sufficient cause has been shown.

¶6Hence, the mandate of the Arbitrator is extended upto 6 months from today to conclude the arbitration proceedings.

¶7The period from 04.09.2025 till today stands regularized. This is a digitally signed order. 8. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 948/2025 SPACIO INTERSPACE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Komal Mundhra, Mr. Rishay Raj, Advs. versus TE HOSPITALITY AND ESTATES LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Mr. Ben Daniel Mathew, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH