- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 22 September 2010
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Bhat
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 1410/2010
Judgment
ORDER %
22.09.2010 LA. No.12820/2010 fO-XXIH. R-3, CPC) This is a joint application moved by the plaintiff and the second defendant. The terms of the compromise are embodied in paragraph nos.1-11. The application is supported by the affidavit of the plaintiffs authorized representative as well as the affidavit on behalf of defendant no.2. In view of the averments and the submissions, the Court is satisfied that the application deserves to be allowed. , LA. No.12820/2010 is, therefore, allowed. CS (OS) 1410/2010 The plaintiff submits that the claim as against defendant nos.l&3 would not be Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. - - f I. pressed. The claim as against the said defendant is, therefore, deemed abandoned and the same is dismissed as against them. The defendant has handed over to the plaintiff a demand draft for Rs.32 Laklrs in terms of the compromise arrived at. In view of the order made in LA. No.12820/2010, the suit is decreed in terms of paragraph nos.1-11 of the application and 61 (a) &
(e) of the suit. All the pending applications are also disposed of. ^ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SEPTEMBER 22, 2010 /dh/
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA. No.12820/2010 IN CS (OS) 1410/2010 MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ORS Plaintiffs Tln'ough: Ms. Jay a Negi with Mr. Nishchal Anand, Advocates. versus SURYA KISHORE & ORS Defendants Through: Mr. Hari Har Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.