Ram Nath v. State Gnct of Delhi

O R D E R %

21.11.2025

¶1This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks directions to the competent authority to release the Petitioner on furlough for a period of three weeks.

¶2The Petitioner was granted furlough by order of this Court dated 8th January, 2024, subject to certain conditions. Since the Petitioner was unable to comply with those conditions, he filed CRL.M.A. 11121/2024 seeking modification of the conditions, which was heard and dismissed by order dated 18th July, 2024.

¶3Despite the rejection of his request for modification, the Petitioner has once again approached this Court seeking furlough in terms of the order This is a digitally signed order. dated 8th January, 2024. Upon a specific query from the Court as to whether he is now in a position to comply with the conditions imposed earlier, counsel for the Petitioner answered in the negative and instead requested that the conditions be modified.

¶4Given the earlier refusal to modify the conditions, the present petition does not appear to be maintainable.

¶5In light of the above, counsel for the Petitioner submits that he would like to withdraw the present petition and seeks liberty to move an application for review of the order dated 18th July, 2024.

¶6Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

¶7It is clarified that whether such a review is maintainable or not will be a matter for the concerned Bench to consider.

¶8Pending application also stands dismissed. SANJEEV NARULA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2025 as This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3835/2025 & CRL.M.A. 34605/2025 RAM NATH .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates. Inspector Sanjay Kr., P.S. Prashant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA