- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 October 2016
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 98/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Muralidhar
Judgment
O R D E R %
27.10.2016
¶1It is stated that the Arbitral Tribunal is already in place and the proceedings are in progress.
¶2In that view of the matter, the interim order dated 19th April 2016 is directed to continue till such time the Arbitral Tribunal varies or modifies it in accordance with law in an application that may be filed by either party under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
¶3It is further directed that the specific direction issued to the Respondents in the order dated 19th April 2016 by this Court to disclose on oath all the assets, both moveable and immoveable, should be complied with by the
O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 98/2016
Respondents by filing the said affidavits before the Arbitral Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today. If there is non-compliance with this direction, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
¶4The petition is disposed of. Order be given dasti.
S.MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 27, 2016 Rm
O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 98/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 98/2016 SHAPOORJI PALLONJI & COMPANY PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.L.Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Babit Jamwal and Mr. Sharad Kharra, Advocates. versus HBN HOMES COLONISERS PVT. LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Sastry, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.