VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Vidya Bhushan@ Shasid Bhushan@ Guddu v. State NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 November 2025
Bench
Swarana Kanta Sharmaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3849/2025

Judgment

O R D E R %

21.11.2025

¶1By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to release the petitioner on Emergency Parole for a period of 60 (sixty) days in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 169/2011, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and Section 25 (1B)(A)(1) of Arms Act, 1959.

¶2Issue notice. The learned ASC accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶3Admittedly, the father of the petitioner has unfortunately passed away on 08.11.2025. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner has not approached the concerned Jail Authorities seeking grant of emergency parole, which can be granted in terms of Rule 1210(V) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. This is a digitally signed order. 4. In these circumstances, it is directed that the present petition be treated as a representation/application for grant of emergency parole, on the ground of the demise of the father of the petitioner herein, which will be decided within one week from date by the concerned authorities, under intimation to the petitioner herein.

¶5In view of the above terms, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶6Copy of this order be given dasti, under the signature of Court Master.

¶7The Registry is directed to send the order to the concerned jail authority, today itself.

¶8The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 21, 2025/ns T.D.

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3849/2025 VIDYA BHUSHAN @ SHASID BHUSHAN @ GUDDU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faraz Maqbool (DHCLSC) with Mr. A. Sahitya Veena and Ms. Deepshikha, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.