VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Shri K.K. Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
8 November 2016
Bench
Valmikij. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 2472/2016

Judgment

ORDER %

08.11.2016

¶1These writ petitionsinvolvedtwo aspects. The first was with respect to who would be the Presenting Officer and the second aspectwhat could be the maximumage of enquiryofficeri^e whetheran enquiryofficercouldbe more than 70 years. W.P.(C) 2472/2016 & conn. page 1 of2 !!•• Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. V

¶2Counsel for the petitioners does not press the first aspect and counsel for the respondent no.2 states that without prejudice to the rights of the respondentno.2/BSESYamuna Power Limited, in these cases the enquiry officer who is around 80 years will be changedand a new enquiry officer will be appointedwithin four weeks fromtoday.

¶3Counsel for the petitionersstatesthat petitioners will participatein the enquiry proceedings before the new enquiry officer and with respect to which intimation will be given by the respondent no.2 to the petitioners as also the present counsel for the petitioners including the date fixed in the enquiry proceedings.

¶4The statement for changing of the enquiry officer is only qua these cases and since it is without prejudice to the rights of the respondent no.2/BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., this will not affect the defence of respondent no.2/BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. in other cases. <

¶5The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid consent order. VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 08, 2016 W.P.(C)2472/2016&com. page2of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

' '• "• • .•/•••-- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . + , W.p-.(C)2472/2016& CMNo. 41253/2016(for stay) SHRI K.K. YADAV • , .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.ureshTripathy, Advocate. Versus GdVT. OF NOT OF DELHr& QRS . ^ , ' Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, ASC, (GNCTD) for R-1. . . •- . . Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, with Mr. Sanjay. Rawat and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R-2to'5. + W.P:(C)4119/2016 & CMNo. 41447/2016(for stay) BISHAMBERDUTT Petitioner Through: Mr. Suresh Tripathy, Advocate. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND QRS Respondents Through: , Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, ASC (GNCTD) for ^ ' R:1.' . _ ; V- - Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar with, Mr. Sanjay Rawat and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for . ' '•:R-2to5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.