- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2025
- Bench
- Amit Sharma
- Case no.
- CONT.CAS(C) 2006/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2025
¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
¶2The present petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeks following prayers:- "a. Initiate Contempt proceedings against the Respondent I Contemnor i.e. Mrs. Narinder Kaur for deliberate and willful disobedience of order dated 07.11.2023 In GP No. 24/23, passed by Hon'ble Judge Family Court, South District, Saket Courts, Delhi. b. Pass any further order or orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case."
¶3Vide order dated 07.11.2023 in GP No. 24/2023, the learned Family Court passed the following directions:- "Perusal of record reveals that vide order dated 26.08.2023 the petitioner was granted visitation rights to meet the minor child on the occasion of his birthday, i.e. 06.09.2023. The minor child is about 3 years old and it is a1way.s good for the wellbeing and welfare of the minor child that he should have regular interaction with his mother, therefore, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is allowed to have interim custody of the minor child from 8th November, 2023 from 11 AM till 10th November, 20,23 till 11 AM. The petitioner/mother· is also granted interim custody of the This is a digitally signed order. minor child on every 2nd Saturday· from 1l AM to following Sunday till 2 PM till further orders. The respondent/father is directed to hand over the minor child to the petitioner/mother on 10th November, 2023 at 11 AM outside of his house at Dehradun, Uttrakhand and also on every 2nd Saturday of every month at 11 AM outside of his house at Dehradun. The petitioner/mother is also directed to hand over the minor child back to the respondent/father on the completion of the interim custody the same place: Both the parties are directed to behave with maturity and strictly comply the order."
¶4A perusal of the record would reflect that the petitioner has already preferred three contempt applications before the learned Family Court which are still pending and the same is next listed before the learned Family Court on 22.12.2025.
¶5Respondent who appears in person submits that she has also filed a contempt application against the petitioner in the aforesaid proceedings before the learned Family Court.
¶6In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to learned Family Court to decide the contempt applications preferred on behalf of the petitioner and respondent as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks, without giving any undue adjournment to either of the parties.
¶7Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
¶8All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.
¶9Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith.
AMIT SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025/sn/db
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 2006/2024 MOHIT CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Madan and Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocates. versus NARINDER KAUR .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.