Urmil Saxena v. Lt.Governor & Ors

ORDER

25.10.2010 W.P. (C) No. 9856 'OO9 & CM AppL. No. 14O46 ^O1O counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that he be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with permission to approach the Tribunal under Section B(3) of the Delhi Education Act, 1973: It is further prayed that the delay in filing the appear, which has occurred due to the pendency ol tle present petition, be also condoned. Counsel for the petitioner has also referred to similar orders passed by the supreme court of India in slp (c) Nos. 628812009 & 6502/2009 titled Abha Gupta vs. Director of Education & ors. and olo i Bina sharma vs, Director of Education & ors,, respectively. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. r1 since the petitioner was pursuing the instant remedy in a bona fide manner, to my mind, it is only appropriate that the delay in moving the Tribunal should not come in the way of the decision of the petitioner's appeal on merits, provided the same is filed within eight weeks from today. It is ordered accordingly, and it would be open to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal under Section B(3) of the Delhi Education Act, L973, without prejudice to any of the rights and conditions raised in this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in the above terms. Dasti. cM APPL. NO. 8071 ^OO9 In view of the orders passed in the main petition, this application does not survive and the same is disposed of as such. l1 { .rA LLlitra' SUDERSHAN KUMAR MI€:ft.A,J. ) 't ocToBER 25, 2O1O rd

Y. $-40 '< IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI I\T NEW DELHI w.P.(c) 9Bs6 /200e URMIL SAXENA Through: VCTSUS LT.GOVERNOR & ORS. Through Mr. Rajiv nn"ju, eoeotitioner ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA