VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Premier Hockey Development Pvt Ltd v. Indian Hockey Federation

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 November 2011
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaulauthor, Rajiv Shakdher
Case no.
FAO(OS) 388/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjay Kishan KaulFollow Rajiv Shakdher

Judgment

ORDER %

04.11.2011, CM No.15025/2011(under O.41 R.27) Allowed subject to just exceptions. . The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) No.388-89/2011 ' After hearing learned counsel for parties at length, learned senior counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that he does not wish to press the appeal but this court d mav clarify any observation made in the impugned order should not, in any way, { ' pt.judice the appellant. Learned senior counsel for the appellant further craves for expedition of the dispute before the Arbitral Tribunal. In so far as the first issue is concerned, we think that paragraph no.63 of the impugned order dated 06.06.2011 takes care of the position and the observations made in the impugned order are only for purposes of disposal of the application under section FAO(OS\ No.388-89/2011 page I of 2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. - ;t-c! /tot 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and would not prejudice the trial before the Arbitral Tribunal. We are ,*" ihut the Arbitral Tribunal will make all endeavours for expeditious conclusion of the dispute specially taking into consideration the nature of the dispute. Dismissed as withdrawn. CM No.15023/2011 (Stav) In view of the disposal of the appeal, no further orders are called for on the application. The application stands disposed of. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,J [" "lr,aJrl J e--- RAJIV SHAKDHER, J D :' I.i-novEMBER o4,2otl vg A \ FAO(OS) No.388-89/2011 Pase 2 of 2

Case details

Parties and counsel

? r'n' -(, I* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 388-89/2011 PREMIER HOCKEY DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.Ganpathy and Mr. Kartik Yadav, Advocates versus INDIAN HOCKEY FEDERATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam and Mr. D.S. Narula, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Manmeet Arora and Ms. Fareha Ahmad Khan, Advocates CORAM: fI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL i-r HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.