- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2017
- Bench
- Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3626/2014
Judgment
O R D E R %
09.11.2017
Today the matter was fixed for arguments on petition for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali.
Status report dated 05.11.2017 has already been filed.
In the status report, Inspector Atul Kumar, SHO PS-Mehrauli has tendered his unconditional apology for the submission of incorrect facts by the then SHO PS-Mehrauli and undertaken to be more careful in future.
Arguments heard.
It is submitted by learned APP for the State that respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali was granted interim bail by the Trial Court on
07.05.2013 for a period of two months. It is further submitted by learned APP for State that vide order dated 08.06.2017, the respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali has been granted regular bail by the Trial Court. CRL.M.C. 3626/2014
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant for cancellation of interim bail granted to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali. However, it has been revealed from the order dated 08.06.2017 that the Trial Court has granted regular bail to respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali.
In view of above, since the respondent No.7 Saiyyed Haider Ali has been granted regular bail by the Trial Court, the present petition challenging the cancellation of interim bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J NOVEMBER 09, 2017 rd
CRL.M.C. 3626/2014
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3626/2014 PARVEEN BANU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Sharma, Advocate for Ms.Shradha Karol, Amicus Curiae, (Advocate) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Atul Kumar, SHO, Mehrauli & Inspector Vikramjeet, SHO, Madhu Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.