- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 August 2009
- Bench
- S.L. Bhayana
- Case no.
- MAC.APP. 616/2008
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S.L. Bhayana
Judgment
JUDGMENT (Oral)
¶1The appellants have challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.16,69,160/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.
¶2The accident dated 30th July, 2006 resulted in the death of Jitender Singh Chauhan. The deceased was survived by his widow, two minor children and parents who filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.
¶3The deceased was aged 31 years at the time of the accident and was an electronic engineer. The learned Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards the personal expenses of the deceased and applied
the multiplier of 13 to compute the loss of dependency at Rs.16,29,160/-. Rs.15,000/-has been awarded towards loss of estate, funeral expenses and transportation of dead body. Rs.10,000/-has been awarded towards loss of consortium and Rs.15,000/-has been awarded towards loss of love and affection. The total compensation awarded is Rs.16,69,160/-
¶4The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal.
(i) The multiplier be enhanced from 13 to 16.
(ii) The personal expenses of the deceased be reduced
from 1/3rd to 1/4th.
¶5It is well settled by the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (6) Scale 129 that the appropriate multiplier at the age of 31 years is 16 and 1/4th has to be deducted towards the personal expenses of the deceased, who has left behind five legal representatives.
¶6Following the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the multiplier is enhanced from 13 to 16 and the personal expenses of the deceased are reduced from 1/3rd to 1/4th. Applying the multiplier of 16 and taking the personal expenses of the deceased to be 1/4th, the loss of dependency is computed to be Rs.22,55,760/- (Rs.1,87,980 X 3/4 X 16). Adding Rs.15,000/- towards the towards loss of estate, funeral expenses, transportation of dead body and Rs.10,000/- towards loss of consortium and Rs.15,000/- towards the loss of love and
affection, the total compensation is computed to be Rs.22,95,760/- (Rs.22,55,760 + Rs.15,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.15,000).
¶7The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced from Rs.16,69,160/- to Rs.22,95,760/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.
¶8The enhanced amount be deposited by respondent No.3 with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch within 30 days.
¶9The order with respect to the disbursement of the award amount shall be passed after examining the appellants who are directed to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing.
¶10List for directions on 27th October, 2009.
¶11Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel for both the parties under the signature of Court Master.
¶12Copy of this order be also sent to Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal, Parliament Street, New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400) through the UCO Bank, High Court Branch under the signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J
AUGUST 27, 2009
mk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of decision: 27th August, 2009 GEETA SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Manish Maini, Adv. versus VIRENDER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. for R – 3. CORAM :- THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.