- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 July 2008
- Bench
- Anil Kumar
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2347/2008
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anil Kumar
Judgment
Crl.M.C.No.2347/2008
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
Crl.M.C.No.2347/2008
%
Date of decision : 25.07.2008
Rajinder Singh Rana
….… Petitioner
Through: Mr.R.P. Luthra, Advocate.
Versus
State & others
......... Respondents Through : Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State
Respondent No.2 and 3 in person.
CORAM :- * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
¶1Whether reporters of Local papers may
be allowed to see the judgment?
¶2To be referred to the reporter or not?
¶3Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J. * Crl.M.A. No.8781/2008
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
The application is disposed of. Crl.M.C.No.2347/2008
The petitioner and respondent nos.2 and 3 are present and learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the parties have settled their disputes. Pursuant to settlement, an amount of Rs.25,000/- was payable by the petitioner to respondent Nos.2 and 3 out of which Crl.M.C.No.2347/2008
Rs.10,000/- was paid earlier and Rs.15,000/- has been paid in cash to respondent Nos.2 today in the Court.
Let the statement of respondent No.3 be recorded, who is identified by learned counsel for petitioner.
Statement of respondent No.3 has been recorded who states that pursuant to settlement arrived at he does not want that proceedings pursuant to FIR No.156/2007 under Sections 279/337 of IPC registered at Police Station Tuglak Road be continued as no useful purpose shall be served.
Considering the facts and in totality of circumstances, as no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant FIR No.156/2007 under Sections 279/337 of IPC registered at Police Station Tuglak Road and it will also be in the interest of justice to quash the FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
Consequently, the FIR No.156/2007 under Sections 279/337 of IPC registered at Police Station Tuglak Road and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
The petition is disposed of with these directions. Dasti.
July 25, 2008
ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.