Nikunj v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors

ORDER oh

02.11.20L1, Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner even on the second call. However, the learned counsel for the State has placed before us the statement of Arpita D/o Sh. Pardeep Mani, recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C which was recorded before the Metropolitan Magistrate, North, on2L 10.2011. As per the said statement, Arpita is residing with her parents out of her own volition. In view of the said statement, no further directions are necessary in this writ pc;tition. The same stands disposed of. NOVEMBER o2,20ll srb -( DAR DURREZ AHMED,J l"'bY VEENA BIRBAL, J Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

{ s-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(cRL) rr2el2orr NIKLTNJ Through None. ..... Petitioner |' ? VETSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ""' Respondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL