VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Rajesh Verma & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 2681/2011

Judgment

ORDER o/o

25.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 3/2000 under Sections 498A/406 IPG registeredat PS Inderpuri,New Delhi on the complaintof Respondent No. 2. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Smt. SreyoshiVermaispresentin personand is identifiedby her counsel. She statesthat the Petitionersand RespondentNo.2/Complainanthave enteredinto aCompromise. In termsof the settlement,marriagebetweenthe PetitionerNo. 1 and RespondentNo. 2/complainanthas been dissolvedbya decreeof divorcebymutualconsent on 1'^November,2004. As partof full andfinal settlementof allthe claims ofthe RespondentNo. 2, the PetitionerNo. 1has paid^42,000out ofwhich ^30,000/-have alreadybeen paid to her and remainingamountof^12,000/- Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. have been paid in cash in Court Today. The custody of the child master Vaibhavwouldremainwiththe RespondentNo. 2. She furtherstatesthat in view of the settlementbetweenthe parties,she does not want to pursuethe abovementionedFIR and the proceedingspursuantthereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differencesof their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purposewill be served in continuanceofthe proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impedimentin quashing the FIR in question. Consequently,3/2000 under Sections498A/406IPC registeredat PS Inderpuri,New Delhiandproceedingspursuanttheretoare herebyquashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgmentof their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposedof. Orderdasti. ) MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 25, 2011 'dk'

Case details

Parties and counsel

28 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2681/2011 RAJESH VERMA & ORS Petitioner Through Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocate with petition in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri APP for the State with SI Satish Yadav. Mr. Dilip Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.